VIDEO/AUDIO
Don't Ignore Chest Pain!
Chest Pain Centers 2003
Early Symptoms and Recognition of a Heart Attack
Emergency Department
The Blair Witch Effect
Welcome Message (long)
Welcome Message (short)
Free Health Videos

ARTICLES
Value of the History in Evaluating Patients for Early Myocardial Ischemia in Observation Chest Pain Centers
Time Is Muscle. Sites With A Passion.
Early Heart Attack Care Program Saves Lives, Resources.
True Heart Stories
Reader's Digest
What a Heart Attack Taught Me...
Emotional Roadblocks, Misconceptions...

EHAC SPECIFIC EDUCATIONAL GROUPS

EXPERIENCES
EHAC Moments
Share Your Experience

SUBSCRIBE
Enter your email address below to subscribe to the EHAC Announcement List:

National Survey of Chest Pain Centers
Rationale and Potential Results

Robert J. Zalenski, MD
Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine
Wayne State University
Detroit, MI



Optimal care for a patient with acute chest pain poses several challenges at the individual, hospital, and societal level. For the patient, the need to seek medical care for chest pain is often uncertain, and delay in emergency department (ED) presentation leads to worse outcomes. For the hospital, patients must be rapidly identified and undergo an electrocardiogram (ECG) to determine eligibility for reperfusion therapies. Even for low-risk patients with normal or nonspecific ECGs, hospital admission frequently ensues to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Admission is often employed to maximize the probability of a desirable outcome and minimize medical-legal exposure of the physician, as the inappropriate discharge of AMI patients is the number one cause of malpractice payouts for emergency medicine physicians. For society, the cost of this approach to $3 billion annually.

An organizational innovation intended to meet most of these challenges is the chest pain center (CPC). CPCs are attached to or closely associated with the EDs of acute care facilities. CPCs can have multiple components. (1) The "attack program" is designed to more rapidly identify and treat patients with thrombolytic therapy. An "observation program" is designed to better detect diseased patients and reduce the incidence of inappropriate discharge. It may also better identify nondiseased patients and reduce unnecessary hospital admissions. The "outreach program" is intended to increase community awareness of the early symptoms of heart attack and to provide individual counseling to high-risk patients.

In order to determine the prevalence, structure, and services of CPCs, the Center for Health Service Research, in conjunction with the Deparment of Emergency Medicine, Cook County Hospital, conducted a national survey of U.S. hospitals. In a randomly selected sample, 475 hospitals in standard metropolitan areas with full-service EDs were selected. The survey was mailed in June 1995, with follow-up mailings for nonresponders in August and September 1995. The response rate was 62%.

The hospitals were selected from a data base provided by the American Hospital Association. The survey was mailed to ED directors who were first identified through telephone contacts. The survey was designed to gather information about the care of acute chest pain patients in EDs with and without associated CPCs.

The target publication date of the survey data is 1996, when the complete findings will be presented. We will examine the overall prevalence of CPCs, their bed size, physical characteristics, and personnel. We will examine the demographics of the hospital EDs to ascertain whether CPCs are associated with delivery of care to particular ethnic groups. We will also compare technology use in EDs with and without CPCs. Hospital characteristics will be analyzed to see if specific cardiac services, such as angiography or open heart surgery, are more common in EDs with CPCs.

The preliminary results provide evidence for the following trends: CPCs have a greater frequency of use of technologies to diagnose AMI, such as serial cardiac enzymes testing and imaging modalities. They also more frequently offer services such as patient counseling and community education, and participate in marketing efforts more frequently than do EDs without CPCs.

The cost-effectiveness of CPCs has been challenged in a recent publication, (2) which stated that chest pain EDs spend between $378,000 and $3.78 million per life saved. Although this study is based on a number of assumptions that are open to question, it issues a challenge to CPCs to define their relevant patient outcomes and show that these are improved with an acceptable cost to third-party payors and society. The information provided by this national survey will further our understanding of the current and future role of CPCs.

References  


1. Graff L, Joseph T, Andelman R, et al. American College of Emergency Physicians information paper: chest pain units in emergency departments - a report from the Short -Term Observation Services Section. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1036-1039.

 2. Shesser R, Smith M. The chest pain emergency department and the outpatient chest pain evaluation center: revolution or evolution? Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:334-341.

Return to Index of Articles for Clinician; Volume 14.4


Home | What's New | What is EHAC? | Abstracts & Articles
Reader's Digest | Contact Us | Search

Tips for Searching

www.ehac.org. Site by AllSoldOut Internet Solutions
Visit the Clinical Information EHAC site at www.chestpaincenters.org.
Copyright © 1996-2001 by St. Agnes Healthcare. All Rights Reserved.

ABOUT US
The Value of Being Prepared
Time is Muscle
Funding/Support
Heart Facts

A Staggering Discovery

FROM DR. BAHR
Dr. Bahr's Introduction to Reader's Digest
To My Patient and Friend

MORE INFO
EHAC Dissemination
EHAC World Proclamation
The Chain of Survival
EHAC Privacy Policy
Add Our Banner to Your Website
EHAC Links

SUBSCRIBE
Enter your email address below to subscribe to the EHAC Discussion List: