VIDEO/AUDIO
Don't Ignore Chest Pain!
Chest Pain Centers 2003
Early Symptoms and Recognition of a Heart Attack
Emergency Department
The Blair Witch Effect
Welcome Message (long)
Welcome Message (short)
Free Health Videos

ARTICLES
Value of the History in Evaluating Patients for Early Myocardial Ischemia in Observation Chest Pain Centers
Time Is Muscle. Sites With A Passion.
Early Heart Attack Care Program Saves Lives, Resources.
True Heart Stories
Reader's Digest
What a Heart Attack Taught Me...
Emotional Roadblocks, Misconceptions...

EHAC SPECIFIC EDUCATIONAL GROUPS

EXPERIENCES
EHAC Moments
Share Your Experience

SUBSCRIBE
Enter your email address below to subscribe to the EHAC Announcement List:

Concept of Community Chest Pain Centers in Emergency Departments

Raymond D. Bahr, MD, FACP, FACC
Medical Director
The Paul Dudley White Coronary Care System
St. Agnes HealthCare
Baltimore, MD



Quick Overview
  • Heart Attack is the Number One Health Problem
  • The Strategy of the Chest Pain Movement
  • Reducing "Time to Treatment"
  • Chest Pain Centers in EDs: Damage Control Centers
  • Heart attack is the number one health problem facing our nation, killing more than 600,000 Americans annually. Its magnitude is such that it surpasses all of the American soldiers killed in previous wars and has been the number one killer of the adult American since the turn of the century. The question then is: Can we do something about the heart attack problem? Can we engineer a victory? The concept of Community Chest Pain Centers in emergency departments (EDs) is presented as a strategy to significantly reduce heart attack deaths (see Table 1). This is a strategy that is currently in place and continues to evolve.(1-6) It is estimated that there are between 700 to 1,000 Chest Pain Centers in 48 states; the growth pattern shows a doubling every 10 months.





    The problem and location of heart attacks, be they acute ischemia or infarction, lies in the community. Since the nucleus of the heart attack problem lies in the community, it is here where the ultimate coronary care unit (CCU) must reach. Thus, it becomes very important to interface early with the public when heart attack symptoms are developing.

    What then is the formula for success? It requires shifting the paradigm of heart attack care to earlier recognition of symptoms so that acute prevention and its benefits are possible. The benefits of early intervention were demonstrated in the MITI trial,(7) in the GUSTO trial, (8) and in the GREAT study.(9) The barrier to early intervention still exists, however. Can we take advantage of prodromal symptoms of a heart attack (see Figure 1)? To do so we need to shift the paradigm of care to acute prevention. Early intervention amounts to acute prevention. Stopping the heart attack allows one to use this teachable moment to educate about primary risk factor reduction. Thus, disease prevention allows health promotion.


    Figure 1

    Reducing "Time to Treatment" for Patients With Acute Myocardial
    Infarction and Acute Coronary Syndrome





    The ED is a natural target for this new paradigm. It is the hospital's "front door" for many patients, such as those experiencing chest pain or chest discomfort. A Chest Pain Center in the ED is a way that a community hospital can focus attention on heart attacks through chest pain evaluation (see Table 2, page 6). It then becomes a basic subunit that when multiplied by the 6,700 community hospitals in the United States provides widespread opportunity for the prevention of heart attack deaths. This basic subunit has been called the "community sarcomere." It allows for more efficiency, more focused attention, proper preparation to take place, and comprehensive management of chest pain patients with cardiac rehabilitation upon discharge. It allows for research activities to further develop critical pathways as well as provide the learning curve that can be shared by a variety of care givers. Such centers can act as damage control centers in preventing heart attacks.



    Crashing myocardial infarction patients (those with total occlusion) make up only 20% of patients with chest pain. It is important to have a "clot team" that follows a protocol to reperfuse the infarct-related artery quickly, but it is also important to have a comprehensive triage and evaluation for chest pain patients. In an August editorial in 1969 (10) on the future of coronary care, Morris Fishbein placed emphasis on chest pain as a sign for the heart attack. He describes 64 patients admitted to Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, NY, where the decision time of the patient was greater than 3 hours. Careful inquiry showed that more than half of the patients had various symptoms, but principally intermittent or increasing chest pain 1 week before the onset of the actual heart attack. Thus, the way to get at the heart attack problem is to ensure that the public we serve is educated about the prodromal symptoms of heart attack so that chest pain patients do not delay in seeking help and that we as a healthcare team are prepared to provide prompt care.

    Development of a low-probability myocardial ischemia critical pathway would allow EDs to screen low-risk patients and provide a basis for community outreach programs. What is the proper message that we can give to the community? The message needs to be specific enough to prevent inappropriate use of the ED by the public and informative enough to change behavior.

    Developing the right message is up to all of us as healthcare providers. We need to interpret the facts that we have at hand in the absence of solid scientific information.(11) There are many different ways of delivering the word and inviting the public. The St. Agnes approach utilizes a mountain cliff scene showing risk stratification of presenting symptoms. It illustrates the consequences of ignoring symptoms or delaying seeking help. EHAC has been coined as an acronym for Early Heart Attack Care to give it status somewhat similar to CPR.

    What is the value of a Chest Pain Center learning curve? The learning curve allows for a common wave length for care givers to participate. It also helps us to recreate the CCU experience which was very powerful and formed the basis for many of the discoveries in heart attack care over the last 30 years. It has a value added component. It also has components of resistance that can be identified and overcome in time.

    References  

     1. Bahr RD. Growth in chest pain emergency departments throughout the United States: a cardiologist's spin on solving the heart attack problem. Coron Artery Dis. 1995;6:827-830.

     2. Bahr RD. The changing paradigm of acute heart attack prevention in the emergency department: a futuristic viewpoint? Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:95-96.

     3. Bahr RD. Acute outpatient care and comprehensive management of acute myocardial ischemia in chest pain emergency departments. Md Med J. 1995;44:691-693.

     4. Bahr RD, Tonascia J. Measuring heart attack care performance: new indices and understanding. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:89-90.

     5. Bahr RD. Reducing time to therapy in AMI patients: the new paradigm. Am J Emerg Med. 1994;12:501-503.

     6. Graff L, Joseph T, Andelman R, et al. American college of emergency physicians information paper: chest pain units in emergency departments-a report from the Short-Term Observation Services Section. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1036-1039.

     7. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, et al (for the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Group). Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy: the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention trial. JAMA. 1993;270:1211-1216.

     8. The GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:673-682.

     9. Rawles J on behalf of the GREAT Group. Halving of mortality at 1 year by domiciliary thrombolysis in the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1-5.

    10. Fishbein M. The future of coronary care. Med World News. 1969:40.

    11. Horton R. The interpretive turn. Lancet. 1995;346:8966. Editorial..

    Return to Index of Articles for Clinician; Volume 14.4


    Home | What's New | What is EHAC? | Abstracts & Articles
    Reader's Digest | Contact Us | Search

    Tips for Searching

    www.ehac.org. Site by AllSoldOut Internet Solutions
    Visit the Clinical Information EHAC site at www.chestpaincenters.org.
    Copyright © 1996-2001 by St. Agnes Healthcare. All Rights Reserved.

    ABOUT US
    The Value of Being Prepared
    Time is Muscle
    Funding/Support
    Heart Facts

    A Staggering Discovery

    FROM DR. BAHR
    Dr. Bahr's Introduction to Reader's Digest
    To My Patient and Friend

    MORE INFO
    EHAC Dissemination
    EHAC World Proclamation
    The Chain of Survival
    EHAC Privacy Policy
    Add Our Banner to Your Website
    EHAC Links

    SUBSCRIBE
    Enter your email address below to subscribe to the EHAC Discussion List: