|
|
EHAC Position Statement
Why do we have the problem with patients having heart
attacks?
Are we doing the best that we can?
Have we not taken advantage of all aspects of the problem?
Are we committing myocardial infraction when it comes
to myocardial infarction?
Infraction of the rules comes about when there are missed signals resulting
in failure to detect early signs and symptoms (so called "prodromata").
The penalty when discussing myocardial infarction is severe in that life
is lost and cardiac invalidism may result. This does not have to take
place. There is no need for this to take place. We set up boundaries
in cardiac care because we presume we know the answers. In dealing with
the community we use the same logic that we did twenty years ago. Back then
we didn't want the patient to know much about his medical history in that
it would presumably, adversely affect him. Now, we use the same logic, i.e.,
we don't want the public to have hysteria about chest pain because it may
invoke fear and perhaps excessive testing, driving up the cost of health
care. Thus we negate the possible approach of a full and active community
participation without giving it a chance. This logic would be okay if all
were going well, but when we have the nation's number one disease, killing
and maiming each day and early cardiac care with clot dissolving therapy
only reaching 20% of the heart attack population we should not tolerate
it. We should become upset and set about practicing zero tolerance
and give a chance to any new idea that may take advantage of present day
early cardiac care. The better logic should be "don't knock it unless
you have tried it". We talked about risk stratification after a heart
attack, but that is too late. What about risk stratification before a heart
attack, especially when the event is starting to occur? Here there is a
window of opportunity that occurs before the crash of death or destruction
of muscle. If we take advantage of the fact that a significant number of
heart attack patients experience prodromal symptoms long before the
crash, we find a way to manage the problem provided that we can detect these
early symptoms. Early detection is the key to solving this problem. The
initial presentation of a heart attack is not easily recognizable or treated
properly. The disease goes undetected until the crash takes place. To change
this community wide programs need to be set up to simplify and make this
detection practical and feasible.
Prevention is the key word in all of medicine. Prevention may come from
the direction of wellness such as that seen with the well baby clinic type
mentality...But prevention is not truly appreciated until it comes from
the other side of the equation, i.e., death and disease. When one deals
constantly with the problem of death and destruction one finds out that
this need not take place; it does so because of time delays that occur because
early warning signs are not properly addressed. We should be upset with
this and aim to correct it. The secret in early detection lies in history
taking.
History taking does not require a physician to be present but can be taken
by the nurse, the paramedic and even the lay person. If the history of early
warning signs of a heart attack can be
taught, can it be done effectively without causing mass hysteria? We have
to find out about this, but we can't do so by putting our heads into the
sand. We need to approach it directly. If we can clue in early on a significant
number of heart attack patients and can teach this technique, then all we
need to do is hook up the delivery of such patients to centers in hospitals
set for early cardiac care, be it clot dissolving or cardioprotection. These
centers may be chest pain emergency rooms or early heart attack care centers
or just emergency rooms with fast track protocols responding to a true cardiac
emergency.
Intelligent patients and intelligent communities can make the difference
in future cardiac care. The medical profession can only go so far. What
is needed are attempts at solutions of the heart attack problems by focusing
on earlier stages that are present long before the crash leading to a heart
attack or sudden death. To preach without attempting to implement has been
the way of the past. What is needed in the future are approaches that simplify
the message and take advantage of early heart attack care by hooking up
to it at the appropriate time. To do less is to add more to the problem
then to the solution. Zero tolerance for complacency in the present environment
needs to be emphasized time and time again.
Raymond D. Bahr, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Medical Director
Paul Dudley White Coronary Care System
St. Agnes Hospital
Home | What's New | What is EHAC? | Abstracts & Articles
Reader's Digest | Contact Us | Search
Tips for Searching
www.ehac.org.
Site by AllSoldOut Internet Solutions
Visit the Clinical Information EHAC site at www.chestpaincenters.org.
Copyright © 1996-2001
by St. Agnes Healthcare. All Rights Reserved.
|
|